The ten dramatic instincts
Hans Rosling asked simple questions about the state of the world to thousands of people: students, journalists, Nobel laureates. The result: they score lower than chimpanzees answering at random. The cause is not ignorance, but ten dramatic instincts inherited from evolution.
Among them: the gap instinct (seeing the world split into two camps), the negativity instinct (noticing the bad more than the good), the straight line instinct (believing a curve will continue forever), the fear instinct and the size instinct (being impressed by a lone number).
Rosling offers a concrete antidote for each instinct. Recognizing when these reflexes kick in is the first step to regaining a fact-based view of the world.
Your mistakes about the world do not come from a lack of information, but from mental reflexes you can learn to spot.
The world in four income levels
Rosling replaces the outdated division between "developed countries" and "developing countries" with a scale of four income levels: less than 2 dollars a day at Level 1, up to more than 32 dollars a day at Level 4.
This grid changes everything: the majority of humanity today lives on Levels 2 and 3, in intermediate conditions that the old binary scheme kept invisible. The great "gap" between rich and poor that we imagine no longer exists in that form.
To make these levels concrete, Rosling describes daily life at each level: how people get around, cook and sleep. Income, more than culture or religion, determines the way people live.
Drop the mental map of "rich versus poor": think in four levels to see the world as it really is.
Thinking about the world through data
Rosling hammers home one principle: the world can be bad and getting better at the same time. Acknowledging progress is not naivety, it is accuracy. The share of humanity living in extreme poverty has been halved in twenty years, and 80 percent of the world's one-year-old children are vaccinated. Almost nobody knows this.
To think straight, adopt the statistician's reflexes: always compare one number to another, look at trends rather than snapshots, be wary of lone figures that seem enormous.
Expect bad news: the media amplify the spectacular, never the slow and steady improvements. Correct this bias actively.
A number on its own says nothing: compare, follow the trend and look for the progress the media never show.
The covers shown differ from the original editions for rights reasons. The summaries are faithfully based on the works.